Distributed Rational Decision Making 5.1 Introduction
نویسنده
چکیده
Automated negotiation systems with self-interested agents are becoming increasingly important. One reason for this is the technology push of a growing standardized which separately designed agents belonging to diierent organizations can interact in an open environment in real-time and safely carry out transactions. The second reason is strong application pull for computer support for negotiation at the operative decision making level. For example, we are witnessing the advent of small transaction electronic commerce on the Internet for purchasing goods, information, and communication bandwidth 29]. There is also an industrial trend toward virtual enterprises: dynamic alliances of small, agile enterprises which together can take advantage of economies of scale when available (e.g., respond to more diverse orders than individual agents can), but do not suuer from diseconomies of scale. Multiagent technology facilitates such negotiation at the operative decision making level. This automation can save labor time of human negotiators, but in addition , other savings are possible because computational agents can be more eeective at nding beneecial short-term contracts than humans are in strategically and com-binatorially complex settings. This chapter discusses multiagent negotiation in situations where agents may have diierent goals, and each agent is trying to maximize its own good without concern for the global good. Such self-interest naturally prevails in negotiations among independent businesses or individuals. In building computer support for negotiation in such settings, the issue of self-interest has to be dealt with. In cooperative distributed problem solving 10, 7], the system designer imposes an interaction protocol 1 and a strategy (a mapping from state history to action; a 1. Here a protocol does not mean a low level communication protocol, but a negotiation protocol which determines the possible actions that agents can take at diierent points of the interaction. The sealed-bid rst-price auction is an example protocol where each bidder is free to submit one bid for the item, which is awarded to the highest bidder at
منابع مشابه
The Relationship between Decision-Making Styles and Attributional Styles in Addicted and Non-addicted Men
Background: One of social problems which has affected our society and resulted in problems for different groups of people is drug abuse. This issue indicates a serious psychological, physical and social problem in community. Social skills have positive and successful influences in prevention of substance abuse. This includes the ability to explain events correctly and then appropriate decision ...
متن کاملThe Relationship Model between Organizational Culture and Political and Rational Behavior in Decision Making and Organizational Effectiveness of Employees in Ministry of Sport and Youth
The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between organizational culture, political behavior and rational approach of decision makers on organizational effectiveness of employees in Ministry of Sport and Youth. The statistical population consisted of all official employees of Iran Ministry of Sport and Youth (N=430). The sample was determined as 203 subjects based on Krejcie an...
متن کاملEffect of Emotion and Personality on Deviation from Purely Rational Decision-Making
Human decision-making has consistently demonstrated deviation from “pure” rationality. Emotions are a primary driver of human actions and the current study investigates how perceived emotions and personality traits may affect decision-making during the Ultimatum Game (UG). We manipulated emotions by showing images with emotional connotation while participants decided how to split money with a s...
متن کاملتبیین رابطه بین هوش عاطفی و سبک تصمیم گیری مدیران
This study deals with clarification of the relationship between Emotional Intelligence (EI) and decision making styles (rational, intuitive, dependant, spontaneous and avoidant) in N.I.O.P.D.C‘s managers. A collection of 55 managers were tested. Emotional intelligence was measured by Sheering’s EI questionnaire, and Scott and Bruce’s decision making style questionnaire was used for identifying ...
متن کاملRational Choice Theory: A Cultural Reconsideration
Economists have heralded the formulation of the expected utility theorem as a universal method of choice under uncertainty. In their seminal paper, Stigler and Becker (Stigler & Becker, 1977) declared that “human behavior can be explained by a generalized calculus of utility-maximizing behavior” (p.76). The universality of the rational choice theory has been widely criticized by psychologists, ...
متن کامل